Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology ; 50(2) (no pagination), 2023.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-2301146

ABSTRACT

Background: Patients undergoing an interventional radiology procedure report some degree of anxiety. Therefore, procedure-related anxiety needs to be managed. The aim of our study was to investigate patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care (MAC) for uterine artery embolization (UAE)-related procedural anxiety in symptomatic uterine fibroids or adenomyosis. Method(s): Between May 2021 and June 2022, 36 patients with symptomatic fibroids or adenomyosis underwent UAE with MAC. Follow-up evaluations consisted of clinical symptoms, degree of satisfaction with MAC in UAE, and complications. Result(s): MAC in UAE was successfully performed in all patients. UAE significantly reduced patients' complaints such as bleeding and pain: the scores for bleeding and pain were significantly reduced after 3 months of UAE compared with those before UAE, indicating the effectiveness of UAE. The mean score of satisfaction with MAC in UAE was 4.3 points, meaning that 94.4% of women were satisfied or very satisfied. No major complications were observed. Conclusion(s): MAC in UAE for symptomatic uterine fibroids or adenomyosis can be emotionally effective and safe for patients who are anxious about the procedure.Copyright © 2023 The Author(s).

2.
Cancer Research ; 82(12), 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1986502

ABSTRACT

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has affected not only the control and management of infectious diseases, but also those of other diseases by deteriorating the general healthcare systems worldwide. In accordance with the suggestion by the WHO for postponement of non-urgent procedures, diagnosis and treatment strategies for the patients with malignancy have been changed. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on primary colorectal cancer (CRC) from multi-institutions in Korea. Methods: Medical records of consecutive patients with CRC between March 2019 and February 2021 in six university hospitals were reviewed. Recurrent diseases, admission for management of complications or enterostomy repair, and other pathologies than adenocarcinoma were excluded. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared after a cohort was divided into the two groups: before and after around March 2020, when the COVID-19 test has been mandatory for all admitted patients in most institutions. Treatment characteristics and pathologic outcomes were also compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 3895 patients with CRC admitted during the study period. After 454 patients were excluded, 1820 and 1621 patients were assigned to the pre-pandemic and pandemic groups. The proportion of patients who could not receive curative or palliative surgery for stage IV diseases was not different (88 vs. 91, P>0.999), and 3262 patients underwent surgery for primary CRC. Among them, the pandemic group showed more previous abdominal surgery (21.2% vs. 15.4%, P<0.001), higher preoperative CEA level (46.7 vs. 16.0 ng/mL, P=0.021), and less stent insertion for obstructive lesion (33% vs. 46.4%, P=0.043). There was no difference in sex, age, the ASA grade, and tumor location between the groups. Perioperative outcomes including operation time, operation method, operation type, and postoperative complication rates were not different, whereas more stoma formation was performed in the pandemic group (15.3% vs. 12.4%, P=0.024). Pathologic outcomes including TNM stage, tumor diameter, harvested lymph nodes, and lymphovascular invasion were not different. However, the pandemic group showed higher tendency of lymph node metastasis (44% vs. 40.6%, P=0.070) and more adjuvant chemotherapy (26.4% vs. 20.1%, P<0.001). Conclusions: Although a few factors indicated more advanced CRC, clinical features and perioperative outcomes of the patients in COVID-19 pandemic seemed not to be aggravated in Korea. The national healthcare system which was not shut down in the pandemic, and relatively small number of COVID-19 prevalence might influence these results, although patients' access and medical checkup seemed to decrease slightly. The cause and effect of decreased medical access would be clarified by long-term follow up data.

3.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 36(1): e3-e4, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1393924
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL